.
Feedback

Even Embryonic Sharks Have Keen Senses & Sensibilities

Study finds that baby sharks in their egg cases can detect predators and react appropriately.

We know that sharks are cool. Every once in a while, we find out that they’re even cooler than we thought.

This week’s “reputation boost” came from researchers at the University of Western Australia, who described how baby sharks can detect a threat from predators even before they’re born.

Before the details, let’s back up for some background.

Backgrounder No. 1:  The species of shark that was studied – brown-banded bamboo sharks – aren’t born. They hatch.

Bamboo sharks and many other species don’t have “live” births. Instead, the females deposit their embryos into the water within leathery egg cases. (Skates and rays – which are cousins to sharks – do this too.) If you’ve visited The Maritime Aquarium, you’ve encountered these empty egg cases at the Intertidal Touch Tank. They’re nicknamed “mermaid’s purses.”

The baby sharks develop in these egg cases and then hatch out.  Prior to hatching, they’re vulnerable to fish, large mollusks and other predators.

Backgrounder No. 2:  Sharks have a sort of sixth sense that lets them detect electrical impulses given off by living things. (That’s how they can “see” a flounder buried in the sand.) Receptors for this ability are visible as a series of tiny holes on the shark’s snout called the ampullae of Lorenzini.

Now, back to what the Australians found:

According to news reports, the researchers discovered that “even within their egg cases, the embryos could apparently detect electric fields in the lab created to mimic those of predators, such as fish. Video recordings showed the developing shark babies responded by ceasing all movements of their gills and keeping their bodies perfectly still.”

They played dead.  Clever baby sharks!

Visit The Maritime Aquarium’s Shark & Ray Gallery and you can see baby chain cat sharks developing in their egg cases. They’re backlit, to reveal the embryos inside. You can watch them wriggling and breathing. And, because they’re behind glass, they won’t detect you and play dead.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Norwalk Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Reverend Barbara Sexton February 4, 2013 at 11:44 pm
Oh, this IS cool! Time for a visit to the Maritime Aquarium! My first academic love was marine biology, truth be told. Blessings, Barb
Jaimie Cura (Editor) February 5, 2013 at 12:38 am
I was big into it too, Barb. Sharks were one of my favorite creatures. I can stare at them for hours, when I go to aquariums.
Reverend Barbara Sexton February 5, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Jaimie-Back in the day of the original 'Jaws', Pop took us 'shark-hunting' on Long Island, which was where Frank Mundus (the 'real life' Quint) operated out of. Thankfully, we never caught any sharks. Why kill such magnificent creatures unless they are confirmed to be 'rogue', you know? But we did catch and eat plenty of tuna...Tuna steaks...tuna salad...stir-fry tuna...tuna chow mein...you get the idea : )
Jaimie Cura (Editor) February 6, 2013 at 01:05 am
What an adventure that must've been, Barb! The question now is - do you still eat tuna after all that?!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.