Politics & Government

Welcome to Your New State Budget & Taxes

The state Legislature wrapped up approval of the state budget and tax package late Tuesday night; Gov. Dannel P. Malloy expects to sign the legislation at 3 p.m. Wednesday.

Connecticut residents woke up to the news of higher taxes Wednesday, as the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives voted to approve a $40.1 billion biennium spending plan just minutes before midnight Tuesday.

The plan raises taxes and fees on everything from income and sales to the cost of cremations and pet grooming.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy is scheduled to sign the FY12/FY13 Biennium Budget in a ceremony in the Capitol Judiciary Room at 3 p.m. Wednesday. He is to be joined by legislative leaders, committee chairmen and legislators.

The House voted 83 to 67, with one member absent, to approve the budget late Tuesday evening. The vote was the final stumbling block in the budget proposed by the governor Feb. 16, but which has gone through several revisions, including the elimination of a proposed three cents a gallon increase in the state’s gas tax and the restoration of $300 worth of a $500 property tax credit that Malloy’s initial budget excised.

The House's debate on the budget lasted almost 10 hours. When it was over 15 Democrats had broken party ranks to join all 52 Republican members of the House in opposing the proposal, including Mary Fritz of Wallingford, Jason Rojas of East Hartford and Steve Mikutel of Griswold. Terry Backer, the assistant majority whip who represents the Stratford area, was absent and did not vote.

Members of the state Senate approved the budget early Tuesday morning in a similar marathon session that ended just after 3 a.m., with 19 in favor and 17 opposed. In the Senate, all 14 Republicans voted against the plan while three Democrats – Asst. Majority Leader Edward Meyer, D-Branford, Sen. Gayle Slossberg, D-Milford, and Sen. Joan V. Hartley, D-Waterbury – joined them in voting against the bill.

Find out what's happening in Norwalkwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Following the Senate vote, state Sen. L. Scott Frantz (R-36) of Riverside said, “The new tax burden imposed under this budget will cause many small businesses to close and make it more difficult for families to make ends meet. Think of the lawn care company in your neighborhood, or the florist, or any small business working on tight margins." He added, "How are they to cope with a budget that raises sales taxes, reduces the property tax credit, doubles the corporate tax surcharge and sets income tax rates at uncompetitive and, in many cases, unaffordable levels?  The fact is, many of them will not be able to.”

As he did after the Senate vote, Malloy praised the House members that supported the budget in a release sent out minutes after the vote, specifically Speaker Chris Donovan, Majority Leader Brendan Sharkey, Appropriations and Finance Co-Chairpersons Toni Walker and Patricia Widlitz.

“With the passage of this budget by the Democrats in the House of Representatives, coming on the heels of yesterday’s passage by the Senate, Connecticut has taken another important step toward much-needed fiscal stability,” Malloy said in the release.

“As I said yesterday, I know it’s a tough vote – it’s also the right vote. This budget is balanced, honest, and contains none of the gimmicks that helped get us into this mess.  It will provide the stability we need to foster much-needed job creation – which is everyone’s top goal,” Malloy said.

The biennium budget, which includes total spending of $19.8 billion for the 2011-12 fiscal year, and $20.3 billion for the 2012-13 fiscal year, plugs a $3.5 billion estimated budget in the coming fiscal year through spending cuts and tax and revenue increases.

The plan also asks for $2 billion in concessions from the state’s unionized employees, which have not been arrived at yet, would add $1 billion to the state’s “rainy day” fund over two years, and breaks with the recent tradition of using one-time revenue or borrowing to help balance the state budget.

Starting July 1, the beginning of the new fiscal year, higher taxes and fees will kick in on numerous items and services under the budget.

The state sales tax will rise from its current 6 percent to 6.35 percent, with 0.10 of that tax being returned to the municipality in which it was spent. While “luxury goods” such as cars costing more than $50,000, boats costing more than $100,000, jewelry over $5,000, and items of clothing over $1,000 will be taxed at 7 percent.

Income tax rates rise almost across the board under the new budget, but more sharply for the state’s highest earners. Married couples earning over $500,000 and single filers earning more than $250,000 will pay 6.7 percent in income tax in the coming fiscal year.

The budget also closes tax exemptions on a number of items, such as yoga studios, clothing and footwear under $50, non-commercial cloth, fabrics and yarn, and non-prescription drugs and medicine.

It also will cost more to attend concerts and sporting events at a number of Connecticut arenas and stadiums, as a 10 percent “admission exemption” also will  be lifted.

New taxes on items that have never been previously taxed before, such as pet grooming, manicures, pedicures, nail services, and auto towing and storage also will be levied.

Connecticut’s estate tax also will be lowered from its current threshold of estates valued at $3.5 million and more to estates valued at $2 million and more. It will be applied retroactively to Jan. 1, 2011.

It will even cost more to renew a driver's license, car registration, pay a motor vehicle fine, or cremate a body under the new budget.

“It’s the largest tax increase in the history of the state of Connecticut, and the devastating affect it’s going to have on our citizens is something that I deeply regret,” Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero, R-Norwalk, said after the House passed the budget early Wednesday.

“Today Connecticut has a clear view of how Democrats deal with our fiscal crisis: raise massive amounts of taxes, on income, property, sales and businesses, and continue to spend to support bigger government. Republicans showed we can close our deficit without raising a nickel in new taxes on anyone,’’ Cafero said in a news release titled House Republican Leader Cafero Blasts Record Setting Tax Hike. “It is a sad commentary on how we do business at the Capitol. There is a big difference between ‘zero’ taxes and $1.8 billion.’’

Cafero and other Republicans pushed for votes Tuesday on everything from the GOP’s own “no tax increase” budget proposal to amendments that would essentially whittle away must of the new tax and fee provisions called for under Malloy and the Democrat’s budget. The Republican proposals stood little chance of success, however, as Democrats control the House by a wide majority, although they did serve to significantly prolong the debate.

Find out what's happening in Norwalkwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

During that debate state Rep. Livvy Floren (R-149) said, "How can we discuss raising taxes without any significant spending reductions? Every family has had to make adjustments to their household budgets.  It’s time for our state government to get serious, tighten the budgetary belt and stop treating taxpayers like never-ending ATM machines."

And state Rep. Lile Gibbons (R-149) added, “This tax package makes Connecticut less competitive relative to more tax friendly states - a position we should avoid rather than augment. ... This budget also imposes a hospital tax with a portion of the revenues redistributed to hospitals across the state and the remainder going into the General Fund. Unfortunately, Greeenwich Hospital stands to lose the most of any hospital in this process to the amount of $7 million annually. We do not need increased taxes as our state does not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem."

Cafero argued, “It might be wishful thinking on my part, but when the details of this budget and the $1.8 billion worth of taxes on everything you can think of gets out to the public they will be so demanding that we change course that hopefully we can come back in the next five weeks and undo what we just did.”

Cafero also complained about “$1.8 billion in taxes at a time when we can least afford it, and the galling part of it is that we claim that we need to tax our citizenry even more, already being the highest taxed state, because we need to spend more money. We’re actually spending more money than we did the year before. In my opinion, with due respect, it’s unconscionable.”

But Donovan, a Meriden Democrat, hailed the spending plan as one that was “fair, balanced and needed.”

“We listened to the public,” Donovan said after the vote. “The governor called for shared sacrifice, and we wanted to make sure that it was fair shared sacrifice. We made sure the middle-income people weren’t hit particularly hard and we asked those who make a little more – kind of the wealthy – to kick in a little more.”

In its final act of the evening, the House opted to forward the budget to Malloy for his approval.

Malloy said it was now time for his administration to reach an agreement with the unions on the $2 billion in concessions called for in the budget, although in recent weeks the two sides have differed publicly in their statements as to how close – or how far apart – they actually are.

“Now it’s up to my Administration to reach an agreement with our fellow state employees and to present it to the legislature for ratification. I remain hopeful that we’ll get there. If we don’t, I remain committed to presenting an alternative budget to the General Assembly in the next couple of weeks,” Malloy said as part of the release he issued just minutes after the House’s approval. 

 “Make no mistake: come July 1, Connecticut will have an honest, balanced budget in place.  No smoke, no mirrors. A solid foundation for the future.”

Norwalk Patch Editor David Gurliacci and Greenwich Patch Editor Barbara Heins contributed to this report.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here