.
Feedback

Running Unopposed, Bruce Morris Is Returning to Hartford [Update]

Representative for the 140th District gets 5,327 votes.

Update Wed. 4 p.m.

Running unopposed, state Rep. Bruce V. Morris will continuing representing the 140th District in the General Assembly, getting 5,327 votes Tuesday.

Original Story

Democrat Bruce Morris is serving his third term in the Connecticut General Assembly. He is deputy majority whip and vice chair of the Human Services Committee. He was named assistant majority whip during his second term and served in that capacity until his promotion to deputy majority whip in
April 2012.

Morris serves as an assistant pastor at Macedonia Church in Norwalk and human relations officer for the Norwalk school system. He is also an elected executive board member of the National Caucus of Black State Legislators.

Harold F. Cobin November 7, 2012 at 08:21 pm
This story was revised to show the final total number of votes Morris received.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Norwalk Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.