.
Feedback

Police: Drugs Found in Car, Occupants Arrested

Tip about driver with a suspended license results in "street team" spotting suspect's car.

An undercover Special Services “street team” arrested two people on drug charges Tuesday afternoon after spotting a car reportedly being operated by a driver with a suspended license.

Police spokesman Lt. Praveen John said the officers knew the license plate of the suspected driver’s car and spotted the vehicle in a gas station on Connecticut Avenue.

The officers reported observing a male exit another car in the station and enter the first car, leading them to suspect a drug transaction was occurring.

The car’s two occupants were ordered to exit the vehicle. The officers found marijuana and crack cocaine in the vehicle, John said.

Octavia Samuel, 23, of 479 Grand St., Bridgeport, was charged with manufacture, distribution or sale of marijuana, illegal possession of a narcotic, illegal possession of a narcotic within 1,500 of a school, and operating a vehicle with a suspended license.

Samuel was held on $25,000 bond and given a court date of Dec. 7.

Christopher Adams, 45, of 9 Union Ave., Norwalk, was charged with possession of less than four ounces of marijuana. Adams was released on a promise to appear in court.

Lisa brown November 29, 2012 at 01:22 pm
That's crazy it sat Chris was arrested. & he wasn't!
Harold F. Cobin November 29, 2012 at 04:42 pm
Could you call me please and we'll go from there. 847-0458. Thanks. H.F.C.
Harold F. Cobin November 29, 2012 at 04:43 pm
This story was corrected to say Samuel's bond was $25,000. H.F.C.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Norwalk Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.