Crime & Safety

Chief Rilling on Keeping Crime Down in Norwalk

Norwalk Police Chief Harry W. Rilling recently commented on how the city tries to keep down crime, what he beieves works or doesn't work. Violent crime in Norwalk recently went down faster than in other cities, although property crime was up slightly.

During the recent municipal election, when candidates from either major political party were asked what they would do about fighting crime, many said they would support a larger, tougher city police force, with more officers on the streets.

But before the most intense part of the campaign season began, Police Chief Harry W. Rilling said in an interview in mid-October that he didn't think that approach would be as effective as a softer one.

"Crime is driven by so many things," he said. "No one factor can be said to contribute [alone]." Opportunities for getting a job and available social programs are two factors, he said, and providing those things "has to be a whole community effort."

Find out what's happening in Norwalkwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Rilling said he's seen studies that show "the least effective approach is a strong law-enforcement effort. The most effective approach is finding opportunities for young people."

"I think, across the country right now, you're seeing more of an effort to get after-school opportunities for young people so that they have structured time, as opposed to unstructured time," Rilling said. The Mayor's Summer Youth Employment program is very helpful toward that goal in Norwalk, the chief said.

Find out what's happening in Norwalkwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"Hopefully, we'll have more grant money that has been earmarked for that," he said. The mentoring program in Norwalk is also helpful in eventually lowering the crime rate, he said.

When someone in Norwalk is on parole or probation, he said, police often "let them know we kind of know who they are," he said. Police tell them "we want you to integrate back into society, and we want you to succeed."

Some employers in Norwalk are "open to taking on such a person"—in other words, hiring them, he said, mentioning as a good example.

over the past two years, Rilling pointed out in a still earlier interview.

One reason crime has gone up in certain areas is that the number of people in younger age groups has gone up. Young people from 13 to 23 years old commit a large proportion of overall crime, he said.

Crime went up in the past when the Baby Boom generation vastly increased the numbers of 13- to 23-year-old youths. The same thing happened when that age group was again increased by the children of the Baby Boomers, and now the same thing is happening with the grandchildren, he said. "When you see that larger number, you can see crime generally going up."

The following table, based on FBI Uniform Crime Reports on the FBI website, shows Norwalk experienced a rise in numbers of violent crimes in 2008 and 2009, although the numbeers have come back down to 2007 levels. (The FBI website had no information about Norwalk for 2006. The years in the table below link to the FBI Web page where the information came from.)

Table 1: Violent crimes in Norwalk

Period

Violent

Crime

Murder/

Manslaughter

Forcible

Rape

Robbery

Aggravated

Assault

2005 308  7  9  92  200 2007 343 3 13 120 207 2008 415 2 12 125 276 2009

425

1

10

157

257

2010

343

6

12

129

196

Jan-June 2010

196

3

9

85

99

Jan-June 2011

171

2

11

59

100

The following tables compare Norwalk crime statistics with those of several other cities in Connecticut. The information comes from FBI Uniform Crime Reports, statistics available from the FBI website. The population figures are taken from the same report, using an FBI formula for estimating numbers of community residents. Note that the FBI cautions against comparing police departments based solely on its Uniform Crime Reports tables.

Table 2: 2009 Violent Crime

Selected Cities

   2009

Popu-

lation      

Total Violent

Crime

   Violent Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)      

Murder/

Man-

slaughter

For-

cible

Rape

Rob-

bery

Aggra-

vated

Assault

Norwalk83,198

425

5.1

1

10157257 Danbury79,729

130

1.6

2

255053 Stamford119,507

353

3.0

2

31151169

Bridgeport

136,049

1,527

11.2

12

58680777 New Britain
70,368
294
4.2
1
6154133 Waterbury
107,007
375
3.5
6
15174180 New Haven
123,659
2,183
17.7
12
599061,206 Hartford
124,049
1,603
12.9
33
49600921

 

 

Table 3: 2010 Violent Crime

Selected Cities

2010

  Popu-

lation      

Total

Violent

Crime

   Violent Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)      

Murder/

Man-

slaughter

For-

cible

Rape

Rob-

bery

Aggra-

vated

Assault

Norwalk84,944

343

4.0

6

12129196 Danbury81,242

116

1.4

2

214647 Stamford122,933

351

2.9

2

19152178

Bridgeport

136,049

1,412

10.4

22

57561772 New Britain
71,334
308
4.3
2
6157143 Waterbury
108,489
366
3.4
5
6176179 New Haven
124,856
1,992
16.0
23
707871,112 Hartford
124,049
1,624
13.1
26
46570982

 

The following comparison of violent crime rates and numbers from 2009 to 2010 shows that rates for most cities went down—but not by as steep a drop as Norwalk's.

Table 4: Comparison of Violent Crime: 2009-2010

Selected Cities

2009 Total Violent Crime

   2009 Violent Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)      
2010 Total Violent Crime2010 Violent Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)

Difference

in rate

'09 to '10

Norwalk

425

5.1
3434.0-1.1 Danbury

130

1.6
1161.4-0.2 Stamford

353

3.0
3512.9-0.1

Bridgeport

1,527

11.2
1,41210.4-0.8 New Britain
294
4.2
3084.3+0.1 Waterbury
375
3.5
3363.4-0.1 New Haven
2,183
17.7
1,99216.0-1.7 Hartford
1,603
12.9
1,62413.1+0.2

 

 

Table 5: 2009 Property Crimes

Selected Cities

   2009

Popu-

lation      

Total Property

Crime

   Property Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)      

Burg-

lary

Lar-

ceny

Motor

Vehicle

Theft

Arson Norwalk83,198

1,786

21.5

314

1,2692038 Danbury79,729

1,536

19.3

219

1,219986 Stamford119,507

2,143

17.9

370

1,6001738

Bridgeport

136,049

5,615

41.3

1,276

3,37596442 New Britain
70,368
3,275
46.5
812
2,0763871 Waterbury
107,007
5,635
52.7
749
4,4224640 New Haven
123,659
7,043
57.0
1,430
4,5331,08016 Hartford
124,049
6,189
49.9
1,135
4,06199384

 

Table 6: 2010 Property Crimes

Selected Cities

   2010

Popu-

lation      

Total Property

Crime

   Property Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)      

Burg-

lary

Lar-

ceny

Motor

Vehicle

Theft

Arson Norwalk84,944

1,878

22.1

323

1,37917612 Danbury81,242

1,515

18.6

258

1,177805 Stamford122.933

1,969

16.0

348

1,42919210

Bridgeport

138,810

4,683

33.7

1,448

2,37785820 New Britain
71,344
3,052
42.8
762
1,8864042 Waterbury
108,489
4,646
42.8
781
3,4414243 New Haven
124,856
7,227
57.9
1,399
4,8151,01317 Hartford
125,626
5,495
43.7
1,019
3,63983795

The following table shows Norwalk property crime rising, and the tables above show that the rise is almost entirely due to larceny cases (not including burglaries, which went down). Among these cities, only Norwalk and New Haven showed an increase in crimes in 2010 over the year before.

Table 7: Comparison of Property Crime from 2009 to 2010

Selected Cities

2009 Total Property Crime

   2009 Property Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)      
2010 Total Property Crime2010 Property Crime Rate (per 1,000 people)

Difference in rate:

'09 to '10

Norwalk

1,786

21.5
1,87822.1+0.6 Danbury

1,536

19.3
1,51518.6-0.7 Stamford

2,143

17.9
1,96916.0-1.9

Bridgeport

5,615

41.3
4,68333.7-7.6 New Britain
3,275
46.5
3,05242.8-3.7 Waterbury
5,635
52.7
4,64642.8-9.9 New Haven
7,043
57.0
7,22757.9+0.9 Hartford
6,189
49.9
5,49543.7-6.2


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

To request removal of your name from an arrest report, submit these required items to arrestreports@patch.com.