.
Feedback

Monsters, Ghosts and Financial Ghouls

When it comes to financial advice, you need to have a radar when something doesn't sound quite right.

Taking a different approach to this post, I wanted to incorporate a story from a client.  Unlike the babysitter discovering the killer is actually upstairs, this is not an urban legend.  The story you are about to hear is true; the names have been changed to protect the innocent. (Cue Law & Order sound effect).

This situation is a prime example of sales practices that exist today and why you need to have awareness of not only whom you’re speaking with, but of what is being suggested to you.  If advice is all you seek, everyone has an opinion and is more than willing to give it to you.  It’s up to you to be able to filter which advice is bad and which is good, or at least know when to get a second opinion from a qualified source.  Let’s call it Financial Literacy.

My clients were diligently saving and accumulating retirement resources to meet their goals.  They were expecting to work until full social security benefits were available to them, approximately seven more years. Understanding they were entering a critical time in their retirement savings, they sought additional advice and expertise from what they were already receiving. 

So where did they go?  There are firms that solicit clients online.  They offer free “Stock Market Outlook Reports” at no cost and no obligation (of course).  There’s really nothing fishy here so far, there were no commitments made, just aggressive marketing.  It’s what one of these firms told my client when they finally got him on the phone that made my head spin.

Once on the phone, they lobbied my client to move all of his assets to the firm; IRA’s, annuities, savings accounts, mattress cash.  Everything.  They would then invest 100% of his assets into the stock market all but guaranteeing him returns of at least 10% a year.   The transactions would have caused early withdrawal penalties to be levied against him and created potential tax liabilities.  For this, they offered to reimburse him.

Investing 100% of ones investments into the stock market may not be prudent risk management so close to retirement, suggesting they could guarantee returns of 10% in the market violates industry regulations, and offering to reimburse  his penalties and tax liabilities is an extremely questionable practice.  Hopefully all of you, like my client, would see something wrong with the bill of goods being sold here. (If you don’t, I know this great bridge in Brooklyn for sale.) 

In most cases, people are honest and trying to help, but you always need to be aware that the truth can be stretched.  There are no magic bullets, and while the firm above may have been able to outperform any other alternative as they boasted, they also may not have, and they definitively were exposing the client to unnecessary risk along the way.  When it comes time to plan for retirement, managing risk is what’s important, not sending your hard earned savings to whomever promises you the biggest return.  Keep this in mind and you’ll be on a better path.

 

 

Noah is a Certified Financial Planner™  and writes on Patch for the promotion of financial literacy and awareness -- a topic in which he believes an informational void exists.  He makes himself available by appointment, telephone, or email to all readers and can be reached at 203-204-6226 or noah@myblueprint.co

Noah Schwartz is a Registered Representative and Investment Advisor Representative of and offers securities and advisory services through WRP Investments, Inc., member FINRA & SIPC.  Blueprint Financial Strategies is not affiliated with WRP Investments, Inc.  Securities and advisory services are supervised by WRP Investments, Inc. at 4407 Belmont Avenue, Youngstown, OH 44505 (330) 759-2023.

Leslie Yager October 7, 2012 at 12:04 pm
Used to get cold calls a lot. The one constant is they're going to make money off you. You may or may not make money - you'll probably lose it. Get on the do not call list.
Glen K Dunbar October 9, 2012 at 04:36 pm
yea..speaking of financial gohls. Like having to pay Capital Gains tax on a house when You buy a condo and are senior citizen. Really unfair.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Norwalk Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.