.
Feedback

One Millon Moms for Gun Control Becomes "Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America"

Grassroots Movement Re-Brands to Support Long-Term Mission

One Million Moms for Gun Control announced Wednesday that it will now be known as Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.

The fast-growing grassroots movement is changing its name two months after it was formed in order to better define its mission: to urge legislators to take action now on new and stronger common-sense gun laws. In addition, the new name will help reduce the likelihood of any confusion with similarly named organizations.

“Getting weapons of war off our streets is an uphill battle, but the only way we’re going to get this done is if members of Congress hear directly from parents, teachers, law enforcement and doctors – the citizens who understand all too well what gun violence is doing to our country,” said California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, author of the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013. “I applaud the leadership of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, and I am grateful for the grassroots commitment of moms all across this country to saving lives and helping to pass common-sense gun laws. Now is the time for action.”

Moms Demand Action’s middle-ground solutions to the escalating problem of gun violence in the United States are straightforward:
1) Ban assault weapons and ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.
2) Require background checks for all gun and ammunition purchases.
3) Report the sale of large quantities of ammunition to the ATF, and ban online sales of ammunition.
4) Counter gun industry lobbyists’ efforts to weaken gun laws at the state level.

Since forming on Dec. 15, 2012, Moms Demand Action has received important input from stakeholders on its name and mission. This input will enable the organization to achieve its long-term mission to build support for new and stronger gun laws at the federal and state levels.

"This name change recognizes that reducing gun violence requires a comprehensive approach that focus on everything from background checks and assault magazine limits to mental health and our culture's glorification of violence,” said California Rep. Mike Thompson, chair of the House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force. “Working together, we can put policies in place that both respect the Second Amendment rights of responsible gun owners and make our schools, communities and country safer."

Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America, said, “We are heartened by how quickly we’ve grown and how central we have become to ‘gun sense’ efforts in America. Like Mothers Against Drunk Driving, our mission is to motivate and mobilize moms to encourage their legislators to support common-sense legislation. Our new name and the term ‘gun sense’ reinforces that there is a middle ground on solutions to the epidemic of gun violence in America.”

First references to Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America in articles should use the formal name. Secondary references can use the shortened version, Moms Demand Action.

About Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America
Much like Mothers Against Drunk Driving was created to change laws regarding drunk driving, Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America (www.momsdemandaction.org) was created to build support for common-sense gun legislation.

The nonpartisan grassroots movement of American mothers is demanding new and stronger solutions to lax gun laws and loopholes that jeopardize the safety of our children and families.

In just two months, the organization has tens of thousands of members with more than 80 chapters across the United States.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Norwalk Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Thomas Paine February 26, 2013 at 01:56 am
AG - But they only collected/confiscated about 600k of the 3mm+ firearms believed to bein circulation at the time of the ban. The anti-gun crowd uses Australia as an example of the effectiveness of bans solely because ere has not been a rampage shooting there since. Bit that negates the craft that there were only 10 gun- caused massacres in Australia in the country's history.
Or that there was no analog to the 2A in Australia to question the constitutionality of the ban. Don't forget the relationship of Ausssie land and GB which had already disarmed its civilians.
Chandra Johnson Greene (Editor) February 26, 2013 at 03:18 pm
Numerous comments from this thread have been deleted because they violate Patch's Terms of Use. Please refrain from insulting each other, thanks!
Alethiologist February 26, 2013 at 03:23 pm
Thanks Chandra.
The topic is too important for conversations to devolve into name calling and other absurdities.
R. Ludlowe February 26, 2013 at 03:29 pm
You asked "Can you propose or implement or enforce any gun-control legislation that will stop people in CT from shooting one another?"
I honestly didn't think it was a serious question because I am not in a position to propose or certainly not IMPLEMENT any legislation. This isn't a one-law fix. We need better gun regulation, vast improvements to the ATF, changes to the way we approach mental health, better discretion on video games/Hollywood. Its all connected. My focal point has been the extremely broken ATF and the need to have a solid leader and enough resources to inspect more than 9% of the gun dealers. Please let me know if that isnt clear enough.
Donald Borsch Jr. February 26, 2013 at 04:05 pm
Chandra,
"An AR-15 or a SIG P239 is an excellent substitute for a penile implant. But in your case body parts can be confused." AZ Is comparing private gun ownership to the need for a penis acceptable? I mean, what does this say about women who are armed? Chandra, if you happen to have a gun, does this mean you need a penis and are trying to gain one through a gun?
Donald Borsch Jr. February 26, 2013 at 04:07 pm
Chandra,
I apologize if at any time I have lowered myself to the level of unreasonable debater and resorted to cheap tactics.
Bill February 26, 2013 at 05:47 pm
In case anyone didn't notice, homeland security, not our military, has ordered 1.6 billion rounds of hollow point bullets. At the same time, our govt. is looking to disarm the public. Is anyone awake out there?
Edmund Burke February 26, 2013 at 05:49 pm
Bill,
Pay your school loans!
Steve February 26, 2013 at 05:58 pm
There is a legitimate reason for the ammo order. Don't believe what Beck and Limbaugh tell you.
R. Ludlowe February 26, 2013 at 05:58 pm
Yes, it seems that our government is planning to shoot every citizen 5.1 times. Is that what the barking dogs inside your head are saying too?
R. Ludlowe February 26, 2013 at 06:00 pm
My real hope is that a purchase like this would drive up the cost of ammo to the point that 'bad guys' couldn't afford it or find it. How many hollow point bullets are manufactured every year? is this a large percentage of the gross? Or a drop in the bucket?
Steve February 26, 2013 at 06:03 pm
Even the NRA says it's much ado over nothing. Just the typical Rightwing propaganda machine getting the sheeple all worked up.
http://www.nraila.org/news-issues/articles/2012/federal-law-enforcement-agencies-buy-ammunition.aspx
Frederick Klein March 1, 2013 at 08:32 pm
You might want to stop citing the Australia figures. http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/ausguns.asp
Frederick Klein March 1, 2013 at 08:33 pm
Again, you might want to stop citing the Australia figures. http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/ausguns.asp
Donald Borsch Jr. March 1, 2013 at 08:47 pm
Frederick,
So the Australian Bureau of Criminology is lying?
Siwanoy March 1, 2013 at 08:52 pm
Donald,
There is no Australian Bureau of Criminology....
Siwanoy March 1, 2013 at 08:55 pm
http://www.aic.gov.au/
"Australian Institute of Criminology" So how is it that this, "Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged anything.. when they don't even exist? http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/compareyears/10/number_of_gun_homicides
Siwanoy March 1, 2013 at 08:59 pm
and by "gun ban in 2002" you mean a slight modification of the restricutions in place:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060225125951/http://www.handgunbuyback.gov.au/ It restricted caliber, barrel length and capacity for sport shooting handguns... which is hardly a ban.
Donald Borsch Jr. March 1, 2013 at 09:01 pm
You're correct Siwanoy. It is Australian Institute of Criminology. I referenced that former name from Abraham's post.
Notwithstanding, does it mean they are lying about the lack of correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime?
Sandra March 1, 2013 at 09:04 pm
Is Fredrick back? You are quoting Snopes as your source. OMG
Frederick Klein March 1, 2013 at 09:13 pm
I'm certainly not going to cite you as a source, Sandra.
Daniel Young March 1, 2013 at 09:24 pm
Sandra prefers that all hers "news' and "facts" be delivered by the looney, raving mad, right-wing fringe.
Sandra March 1, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Randall- good new meat. welcome
Frederick Klein March 1, 2013 at 09:47 pm
McMurphy -- I like your choice of name. Is there some symbolic value in that choice (the rebel against institutionalized conformity), or do you just like the book or movie?
Edmund Burke March 1, 2013 at 09:55 pm
Randall,
Great book , great movie-just gave it to my 22 year old to read.
Frederick Klein March 1, 2013 at 10:08 pm
I read the Snopes article, which discussed how the statistics and what they indicate are more complicated than what someone tries to demonstrate by cherry-picking a few choice numbers. More care should be taken by some on this site when cherry-picking statistics.
Sandra March 1, 2013 at 10:13 pm
Edmund-Fredrick is just trying to make a new friend with Randall.
Give them a moment.
Edmund Burke March 1, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Sandra,
LOL- A guy with a good screen name can"t be all bad-though I wonder if they are rooting for Nurse Ratchet? In those days the left were about "F... the Man" now they are about "Obey the Man"
Frederick Klein March 1, 2013 at 10:41 pm
Can I compliment someone's choice of name from a film I like without you being absurd, Sandra?
Chandra Johnson Greene (Editor) March 2, 2013 at 12:43 am
Thank you for all of your comments, this thread is now closed.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.