.
Feedback

Stop Senior Hunger

 ,   Add to calendar
 Norwalk  See map

This year is reaching out to the community to help seniors who are having difficulty affording nutritious food. 

Hunger is a serious and growing challenge that many of our seniors are quietly facing. 

At least one in nine seniors is at risk of going hungry due to the inability to obtain sufficient food for their household or having to choose between food and medical care.

In response to a growing need for awareness about senior hunger, the Comfort Keepers system has launched a nationwide campaign called STOP Senior Hunger to create awareness for the importance of a healthy diet for those 65 and over.

This senior nutrition campaign aims to help seniors preserve their independence by providing diet and nutrition information, encouragement and necessities.  

To increase this awareness we are organizing a STOP Senior Hunger Food Drive.  

The Connecticut Food Bank in Fairfield, Connecticut, will be the recipient of all food collected the day of the drive.



 

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.