.
Feedback

Smurf, a miracle kitten needs your help

Smurf is an extraordinary kitten who recently had a miracle surgery to save his life.

Smurf is an extraordinary kitten. He came to us after his mother died, when he was just 4 weeks old. He recently had surgery to correct his congenital condition, pectus excavatum - it's a congenital deformity where several ribs & the sternum grow abnormally causing a dent in his chest that was impairing his cardiac and respiratory function. To correct it the surgeon made a custom splint and sutured his sternum to it in order to pull it down into a normal position. The splint will stay on for about 6 weeks and we will be checking and making adjustments every 2 weeks. 


Please considering helping by donating towards his vet bills. 

Visit our website: www.animalnation.org and click donate to use PayPal. This condition and this surgery are both rare and as you can imagine, quite costly to fix. Smurf appreciates your help, love and prayers.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Norwalk Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:50 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel not include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer a perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.